ISLAMABAD: Audio and video recordings circulating on social media have sparked fresh controversy after they allegedly showed a militant identified as Shahzad, described by Pakistani authorities as a member of the banned “Fitna al-Khawarij” network, discussing political developments in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) and expressing support for the banned Joint Awami Action Committee.
According to claims made by security and political commentators, the recordings purportedly show Shahzad delivering a prepared statement from Afghanistan and commenting on recent protests linked to the banned committee.
In the video, Shahzad allegedly describes the committee’s campaign as an attempt to seek freedom from Pakistan and says future developments involving the Pakistani state will soon become apparent.
Separately, an audio recording purportedly captures a conversation between Shahzad and an individual identified as a leader of the banned Joint Awami Action Committee. In the recording, the speakers allegedly discuss mobilizing supporters, creating unrest and opposing the conduct of elections in Azad Kashmir.
The audio also includes remarks attributed to Shahzad advocating the use of force to pursue political objectives and influence future developments in the region.
Pakistani analysts and security commentators cited by local media claimed the recordings indicate coordination between militant elements and individuals associated with the banned committee. They further alleged that the statements reflected narratives favorable to India.
The authenticity of the audio and video recordings could not be independently verified, and no official forensic assessment has been made public.
The banned Joint Awami Action Committee has not publicly responded to the allegations contained in the recordings. Indian authorities have also not commented on the claims.
The development comes amid heightened political tensions in Azad Kashmir, where authorities recently banned the Joint Awami Action Committee and launched legal action against several of its members following violent protests and clashes with security forces.
Security analysts cited by local media said the alleged support expressed by militant figures for the banned committee would likely intensify scrutiny of the group’s activities and its alleged external links. However, they stressed that any claims regarding coordination, foreign backing or criminal conduct would require verification through official investigations.
