ISLAMABAD: The release of the groundbreaking National Citizen Survey 2026 has brought to light a profound and alarming disconnect between the primary concerns of everyday citizens and actual state budget allocations across Pakistan. Conducted by IPOR Consulting and organized in collaboration with PILDAT Consulting in Islamabad, this landmark public poll represents one of the most comprehensive nationwide studies ever undertaken. Spanning all four provinces across both rural (60 percent) and urban (40 percent) areas, the poll engaged a robust sample size of 5,155 adult citizens covering diverse age brackets, income tiers, and genders. The findings reveal startling revelations that challenge conventional policymaking, exposing a stark contrast where pressing public anxieties regarding utility costs, economic survival, and societal pressures clash directly with federal fiscal priorities.
Key Disclaimers and Methodology
- Scope and Scale: This poll stands as one of the largest independent public surveys representing all provinces, blending urban and rural demographics with a sample size exceeding 5,000 respondents.
- Demographic Representation: The survey meticulously incorporated balanced representations across all age groups, genders, and income brackets to ensure unbiased, nationwide accuracy.
- Statistical Rigor: Executed with complete professional independence by IPOR Consulting and facilitated by PILDAT Consulting, the study maintains a high 95 percent confidence level with a margin of error capped at
Major Findings and Statistical Breakdown
- Utility Pressures as the Foremost Crisis: An overwhelming 19 percent of respondents identify soaring electricity and gas prices as the single most critical national problem, outstripping all other economic anxieties.
- Fiscal Disproportionality in Debt Servicing: Highlighting a severe mismatch between public needs and state budgets, 9 percent of federal funds are consumed entirely by debt servicing, whereas the national health budget languishes at a meager 0.1 percent—marking a staggering 430-fold difference compared to debt repayments.
- Perception of Corruption and Bribery: Contrary to widespread public assumptions, 78 percent of respondents report never experiencing a bribery-related encounter, while only 18 percent admit to having been solicited for a bribe by a public official over the past year.
- Business Hurdles and Taxation: A striking 91 percent of respondents assert that running or starting a business in Pakistan is exceptionally difficult, pointing to the existing taxation structure as a primary structural obstacle.
- Institutional Trust Deficit: The survey exposes a profound crisis of confidence, revealing that no single state institution—neither parliament, the election commission, nor federal revenue bodies—enjoys complete public trust. Specific confidence ratings stand at 33 percent for the FIA, 23 percent for Parliament, 15 percent for the Election Commission, and 13 percent for the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).
- Information Consumption and Moral Degeneration: While 42 percent of citizens rely primarily on television for news and current affairs, 56 percent hold unchecked internet and social media usage directly accountable for moral degradation in society.
- Narcotics Threat: A massive 79 percent of surveyed citizens view the rampant surge in drug addiction as an “extremely dangerous” threat to the nation’s social fabric.
- National Debt Anxiety: 66 percent of citizens view soaring national debt as a grave and alarming crisis, with 49 percent explicitly categorizing it as “extremely dangerous.”
- Skepticism Toward INGOs and Think Tanks: 43 percent of respondents believe that foreign-funded reports and non-governmental think tank assessments are driven by hostile foreign agendas rather than factual ground realities, while only 25 percent consider them objective.
- Critique of Economic and Educational Frameworks: 60 percent of citizens argue that Pakistan’s current educational framework fails to fulfill the demands of a modern economy, and 68 percent view IMF programs as either directly detrimental or entirely unbeneficial to the common public.
- National Survey Reports Rise in Horses, Mules, and Donkeys Across CountryALSO READ:
- Generational Divide on Digital Regulation: Respondents over 30 years of age overwhelmingly advocate for stringent government control and regulation over internet and social media platforms, whereas the youth under 30 remain intensely averse to digital restrictions.
